Increasing reliability of chat on Twinmind

Increasing reliability of chat on Twinmind

Oct 2025 - Nov 2025

Oct 2025 - Nov 2025

INTRODUCTION

TwinMind is an AI app that transcribes audio and creates summaries. Users go to the chat feature to ask questions about live and past captures.

My Role

I owned the end-to-end chat redesign for mobile and handed off to dev. I partnered with Engineering to scope the MVP and iterate using post-launch feedback.

Team

1 Designer (me)
2 Engineers

Rithvika Reddy, Aashna Keswani,
Atmaja Patel, Mehak Garg

OVERVIEW

opportunity

opportunity

The chat UI was quickly put together in the MVP, how can we improve reliability and trust for 300k+ users?

Restore meaningful communication between readers and journalists on the CNN mobile app

AT A GLANCE

Redesigned the chat flow to be more reliable through thinking tokens, clear context and error + recovery states

BEFORE + AFTER REDESIGN

The new chat reduced perceived latency by at least 10-15s

Before

After

PROBLEMS

Users couldn’t predict how the chat would respond or what context it was using

To build trust in AI, users need visible signals of progress, context, and grounding, not hidden controls or opaque loading states.

Confusing UI for key points like model selector

Opaque loading states increasing streaming time

Thinking takes too much space in the response

POST-ROLLOUT

Figuring out how to show the context was key in differentiating from other generic AI-tools

POST-ROLLOUT

Post-launch feedback revealed confusion around model selection and chat context

CORE FLOWS

Model + context selector

CORE FLOWS

Context + Thinking tokens

CORE FLOWS

Error + recovery states

CORE FLOWS

Usage in the rest of the app

REFLECTION

Improving chat reliability required changes to both the interface and how the AI responded

Bud.ai fits into design and engineering teams and has the ability to act as an interdisciplinary collaborator. Let's look at what it can do for you

Coming up with 25+ common user questions and the tools that it should use

Rather than inventing new behaviors, I looked at tools journalists and audiences already trust—editorial review systems, creator platforms, and lightweight interaction patterns like polls and inline feedback.

Writing guidelines for response formatting

The natural next step is to design where journalists decide what to ask, when to ask it, and how to interpret responses. This would include:

  • A guided poll creation flow that helps journalists frame unbiased, clear questions

  • Visibility into audience confidence, sample size, and response quality

  • Tools to translate poll insights into follow-up reporting